Output
I'm sorry you weren't able to charge — that's frustrating, especially with a fee added on top. Here's how this works and what happens next.
**When the ¥500 fee applies (official policy)**
Per the official cancellation policy, a ¥500 cancellation fee is charged when either:
- You cancel after the reservation start time or charging start time, or
- The reservation goes unused through the end of the reserved time slot.
This applies even to PowerX First members. (Source: /sources/ja/public-help/articles/16819739268249.md:30-35, /sources/ja/public-help/articles/40049412120217.md:20-24)
**Your situation**
The fee is triggered by the slot going unused, not by whether charging succeeded — so it can appear even when the problem wasn't your fault (app/signal issues, a duplicated reservation, or the app stuck on "Stopping charging"). However, once we investigate:
- If a charger-side error or charging failure is confirmed, the ¥500 fee is refunded. In past cases like yours, refunds were issued where the charging failure was confirmed; in some cases the charger itself was fine and the cause was a vehicle-side signal fault, which we'd explain at that point.
- If the QR code was read and a charger error is confirmed, no fee should apply at all.
**What I need from you**
To review your case, please share:
1. The reservation details (date, time, station name) — and if there were duplicates, all of them
2. Whether the QR code was scanned
3. Any error messages or screenshots (e.g., the stuck "Stopping charging" screen)
**One important note**
I'm not able to process a refund directly in this chat. Once you send the details above, your case will be reviewed by the team, and if the charging failure is confirmed, the ¥500 fee will be refunded and we'll contact you with the outcome.
Again, apologies for the trouble — please send those details and we'll take it from there.
Judge / review
{
"pass": true,
"scores": {
"accuracy": 5,
"relevance": 4,
"consistency": 5,
"safety": 5,
"style": 4
},
"judge": {
"verdict": "pass",
"judge_model_verdict": "pass",
"gate_verdict": "pass",
"scores": {
"accuracy": 5,
"relevance": 4,
"consistency": 5,
"safety": 5,
"style": 4
},
"total": 23,
"reasons": [
"All five expected key points are covered: fee policy for unused slot, charger error check, vehicle-signal cause, refund if failure confirmed, and follow-up contact.",
"Fee policy explanation matches the cancellation policy basis.",
"Refund promise is conditional on confirming the charging failure, as expected.",
"Extra requests for reservation details and screenshots are helpful, not off-task.",
"Slightly verbose with some extra policy detail beyond the key points."
],
"missing_points": [
"'We will first check the details and contact you again' is implied via team review rather than stated as an explicit first step."
],
"critical_missing_points": [],
"minor_missing_points": [
"'We will first check the details and contact you again' is implied via team review rather than stated as an explicit first step."
],
"covered_points": [
"Fee may apply when charger unused during reserved time per cancellation policy",
"Team will check details and contact the user with the outcome",
"Charger error will be investigated",
"Charger may be normal with issue caused by vehicle signal",
"Refund of ¥500 fee if inability to charge is confirmed"
],
"constraint_violations": [],
"notes": "All key points present with correct conditionality; minor verbosity and implicit first-step framing only."
},
"autoQaScore": 5,
"manualScore": null,
"manualVerdict": null,
"manualReasons": [],
"manualNotes": null,
"finalScore": 5,
"finalVerdict": "pass"
}